This article provides parameters for the quantity and types of note and box calibration processes.
The calibration process is a critical moment for companies, not only due to its importance for bonus payments or succession processes but also due to the complexity of conducting committees and dealing with various opinions.
If you haven't defined how your calibration process will be conducted, we suggest starting by reading our suggested calibration process template. In it, you will find suggestions for selecting participants for the committees and a schedule.
Another important decision is to determine what and who will be addressed, and for that, we provide some important data below:
1. Note Calibration
How many people have calibrated notes in the committees?
According to our databases, of the calibrated evaluations, 51% of people had some notes calibrated, while 49% had no notes calibrated.
What is more commonly calibrated?
Final averages, topics, or questions?
Within Qulture, the distribution of calibrated data is:
-
54.1% calibrate notes for questions.
-
33.9% calibrate final averages.
-
12% calibrate topic averages.
2. Box Calibration
How many people had their positions calibrated within the box?
According to our databases, 26.08% of people had their positions calibrated, while 73.92% did not have their positions calibrated.
What is the most common type of calibration? For better or worse?
Of the calibrations performed in the system, we have:
-
39.95% of movements were for the better.
-
33.01% of movements were for the worse.
-
18.34% maintained the same position, using calibration only for information recording.
-
8.7% of movements improved in one axis but worsened in the other.
How many calibration meetings are created, and how many calibrations are conducted within them?
On average, 6.55 calibration meetings are created per box, and 9.27 people are calibrated per meeting.
We hope this content helps you with your calibrations.
Questions? #ChatWithUs 🤘🚀